OK  so I'm not the first to see this post, but I do seem to be the first to reply.

So, the first question was.... "Do we need this site?"

Hmm, that's a curly one.

My thinking is 'yes, we do need this site'

As with anything in this world, our internet site is only as good as the people who use it. It was a big deal at first, but the shine has rubbed off and now it's feeling a little lonely. Can we make it a more useful and better site?.... Yes, but it all takes work. Perhaps we can think a little and come up with some long term goals for the site and figure out what it is we would like to achieve with it.

Second question..... well, I've sort of answered that.

So, who else is going to throw in their two cents??

Swamprat

AKA  Peter Dower

OK  so I'm not the first to see this post, but I do seem to be the first to reply.

So, the first question was.... "Do we need this site?"

Hmm, that's a curly one.

My thinking is 'yes, we do need this site'

As with anything in this world, our internet site is only as good as the people who use it. It was a big deal at first, but the shine has rubbed off and now it's feeling a little lonely. Can we make it a more useful and better site?.... Yes, but it all takes work. Perhaps we can think a little and come up with some long term goals for the site and figure out what it is we would like to achieve with it.

Second question..... well, I've sort of answered that.

So, who else is going to throw in their two cents??

Swamprat

AKA  Peter Dower

OK  so I'm not the first to see this post, but I do seem to be the first to reply.

So, the first question was.... "Do we need this site?"

Hmm, that's a curly one.

My thinking is 'yes, we do need this site'

As with anything in this world, our internet site is only as good as the people who use it. It was a big deal at first, but the shine has rubbed off and now it's feeling a little lonely. Can we make it a more useful and better site?.... Yes, but it all takes work. Perhaps we can think a little and come up with some long term goals for the site and figure out what it is we would like to achieve with it.

Second question..... well, I've sort of answered that.

So, who else is going to throw in their two cents??

Swamprat

AKA  Peter Dower

Thanks Peter

Not bad 43 reads 3 replys from one.

I prefer a site with a slope and a breeze.

But...

We need this site as a place holder for the club. It does not need to be fabulous and dynamic. It can just contain the club description committee members and contact numbers at minimum. Don't worry if it isn't fabulous.

Don't forget to visit 

Stanwell site 
HGFA
HGFA forums
NSWHPA
NSWHPA group spaces
Norhtern Beaches
Sydney HGC YAHOO thingy
Yahoo discussion groups
Oz report
 

If you visit all these sites you miss out on flying